Theoretically, when LACP is configured, a bond shouldn't receive
any packets on disabled slaves.  This patch enforces that
invariant.
---
 lib/bond.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/bond.c b/lib/bond.c
index d8e0966..a48d9c9 100644
--- a/lib/bond.c
+++ b/lib/bond.c
@@ -559,10 +559,12 @@ enum bond_verdict
 bond_check_admissibility(struct bond *bond, const void *slave_,
                          const uint8_t eth_dst[ETH_ADDR_LEN], tag_type *tags)
 {
+    struct bond_slave *slave = bond_slave_lookup(bond, slave_);
+
     /* Admit all packets if LACP has been negotiated, because that means that
      * the remote switch is aware of the bond and will "do the right thing". */
     if (bond->lacp_negotiated) {
-        return BV_ACCEPT;
+        return slave->enabled ? BV_ACCEPT : BV_DROP;
     }
 
     /* Drop all multicast packets on inactive slaves. */
@@ -576,8 +578,6 @@ bond_check_admissibility(struct bond *bond, const void 
*slave_,
     /* Drop all packets which arrive on backup slaves.  This is similar to how
      * Linux bonding handles active-backup bonds. */
     if (bond->balance == BM_AB) {
-        struct bond_slave *slave = bond_slave_lookup(bond, slave_);
-
         *tags |= bond_get_active_slave_tag(bond);
         if (bond->active_slave != slave) {
             static struct vlog_rate_limit rl = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 5);
-- 
1.7.5.2

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to