On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:37:01PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Is "xrecv" standard terminology for LACP?
For CFM, I mean, of course. > Otherwise I'd prefer > something a bit more spelled out. "xrecv" looks too much like my > personal convention of adding an "x" to the beginning of a struct > member name to find all the references to it via compiler errors. It > makes me think that somehow I committed a half-finished experimental > change. > > Otherwise it looks OK to me. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
