[adding d...@openvswich.org back, did you drop it accidentally?] On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:00:39PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > Is it sufficient to use a different destination MAC or should we use a > > different Ethertype (in practice LLC+SNAP) also? > > I personally think it's sufficient. I like using the CFM eth type > because tcpdump knows to parse it. The spec encodes a lot of meaning > into the destination address so it seems improbable to me that it we > would end up conflicting. I'd prefer to change the eth type if it > actually becomes a problem.
OK, let's leave it for now. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
