> All of it seems fine. I'm unsure of the rationale for the new criteria > for coverage logging. Off-hand, I would have just logged it whenever we > print the "unreasonably long poll interval" message. Any particular > reason for the 100 ms criteria there?
I thought we might want to see the coverage counters more often as general information. The rationale is dubious however, I'll change it and merge. Thanks for the review. Ethan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
