On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:50:31AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > I tested this (without the extra malloc), and this is a minor > improvement on master, but a huge, in the order of ~40% performance > increase on top of the NUMA patches I sent yesterday. Also, > performance does not vary so much any more, and it is now actually > beneficial to add more threads and netperfs. Now, with this and the > NUMA level kernel stats, find_match_wc() is actually the top line on > ?perf?, as it should! > > Based on testing only: > Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]>
That is awesome. I'm still working on fixing all the races in initialization and destruction of fatlocks. I'll send it out for final review when I'm happy. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
