FWIW the exact percentage gains are different in my setup, but the general result that these two patches stacked on top of each other make a big difference is consistent with what I've seen.
Ethan On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:50:31AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: >> I tested this (without the extra malloc), and this is a minor >> improvement on master, but a huge, in the order of ~40% performance >> increase on top of the NUMA patches I sent yesterday. Also, >> performance does not vary so much any more, and it is now actually >> beneficial to add more threads and netperfs. Now, with this and the >> NUMA level kernel stats, find_match_wc() is actually the top line on >> ?perf?, as it should! >> >> Based on testing only: >> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]> > > That is awesome. > > I'm still working on fixing all the races in initialization and > destruction of fatlocks. I'll send it out for final review when I'm > happy. > > Thanks, > > Ben. > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
