On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Graf <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/24/14 at 01:43pm, Pravin Shelar wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Kyle Mestery <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Neutron uses those for the physical bridge mappings when using the OVS >> > agent with the ML2 plugin [1] and VLANs. >> > >> > [1] >> > http://docs.openstack.org/havana/install-guide/install/apt/content/network-node-install-plugin-openvswitch-agent.html >> > >> >> Thanks for the link. >> So here we are using the name in similar way, so Why should that cause >> confusion? > > I think you got the point, it's similar but not necessarily compatible > which could be a source for confusion. > Only difference the way we use this device, otherwise everything is same. I want userspace tunneling to be drop-in replacement of kernel based tunneling, So let me know if there is any other difference. We can fix it or document it.
> How about we propose to use the "tun-eth1" for the bridge name? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
