> On Feb 16, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Sorin Vinturis > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nithin, in a NEW NL command, when the WFP filter needs to be created for a > new tunnel port, the code runs at dispatch IRQL. At dispatch IRQL any WFP > call fails. That is why I have created a thread for postponing WFP-based work > when the IRQL is lowered at passive level and the WFP calls can be > successfully executed. > > I am not in favor of temporarily lowering the IRQL, because this will break > the purpose of mutual exclusion that is used for the switch ports.
I agree. Let’s discuss during the IRC meeting tomorrow. Welcome back. -- Nithin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
