On 04/18/2015 01:04 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > We need to have a priority-0 logical datapath flow to act as a catch-all. > The easiest way to make sure that it doesn't overlap with NB-provided ACLs > is to prohibit them from using priority 0. > > Maybe we should restrict ACLs to some smaller range of priorities to allow > for higher- and lower- priority flows in the logical datapath table. I > haven't carefully thought it through. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
Acked-by: Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
