Actually I meant the artifactId in pom.xml ;) <artifactId>openwebbeans-jsf</artifactId>
The structure is fine as it is. It's solely about our strategy to support both JSF-1 and JFS-2 apps. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > Subject: renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?) > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 11:07 AM > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, > Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped > handling and it turned out that I do not need anything OWB > special. So this i a completely CDI independent > >>portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour > to _not_ add it to openwebbeans-jsf but to a new > 'extensions' module. > > > you said "openwebbeans-jsf", but the actual name is > webbeans-jsf; > I agree with your implicit message, that it should not be > named "webbeans-xyz"; > > What is your guys opinion on renaming the modules? > > Option 1: > openwebbeans-xzy (maybe too long for some folks) > > Option 2: > owb-xzy > > > Option 3: > Do nothing :-) > > > -Matthias > > > > > +1 > > > >> > >> This also has the side effect that we now for the > first time really use JSF2 functionality, and thus it would > not be possible to use OWB with JSF-1 applications anymore! > But since I consider OWB + JSF-1 a very important scenario > (for making migration easier and due to the fact that there > is still no JSF-2 component taglib on the market!), I don't > like to add this to openwebbeans-jsf. > >> > > > > +1 > > > >> This opens the general question on how we cope > with JSF-1 vs JSF-2 in the future. > > > > If these extras aren't too big, maybe going parallel > is fine, for a > > while. I guess I need to think > > about that a bit more :-) > > > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
