>>>The structure is fine as it is. +1 and Option 3 :) 2010/1/12 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> Actually I meant the artifactId in pom.xml ;) > > <artifactId>openwebbeans-jsf</artifactId> > > The structure is fine as it is. It's solely about our strategy to support > both JSF-1 and JFS-2 apps. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > > Subject: renaming of the modules (was: Re: fully going JSF2?) > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 11:07 AM > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, > > Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> I have coded the javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped > > handling and it turned out that I do not need anything OWB > > special. So this i a completely CDI independent > > >>portable implementation, and as such I'm in favour > > to _not_ add it to openwebbeans-jsf but to a new > > 'extensions' module. > > > > > > you said "openwebbeans-jsf", but the actual name is > > webbeans-jsf; > > I agree with your implicit message, that it should not be > > named "webbeans-xyz"; > > > > What is your guys opinion on renaming the modules? > > > > Option 1: > > openwebbeans-xzy (maybe too long for some folks) > > > > Option 2: > > owb-xzy > > > > > > Option 3: > > Do nothing :-) > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > >> > > >> This also has the side effect that we now for the > > first time really use JSF2 functionality, and thus it would > > not be possible to use OWB with JSF-1 applications anymore! > > But since I consider OWB + JSF-1 a very important scenario > > (for making migration easier and due to the fact that there > > is still no JSF-2 component taglib on the market!), I don't > > like to add this to openwebbeans-jsf. > > >> > > > > > > +1 > > > > > >> This opens the general question on how we cope > > with JSF-1 vs JSF-2 in the future. > > > > > > If these extras aren't too big, maybe going parallel > > is fine, for a > > > while. I guess I need to think > > > about that a bit more :-) > > > > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
