we also must not forget to change our MethodHandlers, e.g. NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler et al. Those are currently implementing the javassist.util.proxy.ProxyHandler interface.
It's actually not too much, but it's a pretty sensitive area. LieGrue, strub --- James Carman <[email protected]> schrieb am Di, 23.2.2010: > Von: James Carman <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release M4 > An: [email protected] > Datum: Dienstag, 23. Februar, 2010 13:40 Uhr > I was looking into it. So, the > only place where we do any proxy > creation stuff is in the JavassistProxyFactory class? > If so, here's > what I plan to do: > > 1. Rename the class. > 2. Change the implementation to use Commons Proxy > instead, perhaps > the ProxyFactory used inside the logic should be looked up > as a > singleton just like we do elsewhere, so it can be > configured? > > Thoughts? > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think that would be too much of a change for M4. > > > > But I definitely would like to have this for 1.0.0 :) > > > > This would completely remove us from the hardcoded > javassist dependency, thus integration into any kind of EE > Application Server would really leverage from it! > > > > Btw, thanks again for helping us on that, James! > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- James Carman <[email protected]> > schrieb am Di, 23.2.2010: > > > >> Von: James Carman <[email protected]> > >> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release M4 > >> An: [email protected] > >> Datum: Dienstag, 23. Februar, 2010 13:27 Uhr > >> Do you guys want the commons-proxy > >> changes in M4? > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu > >> <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi folks; > >> > > >> > I plan to release M4 this week. Please commit > your > >> recent changes that you > >> > would like to include in M4 until Friday. We > will > >> freeze code on Friday > >> > night and I will build a release at weekend. > Probably > >> VOTE on the release > >> > will be at next Monday. > >> > > >> > Please do no commit __big__ changes to > current code > >> base that may cause to > >> > cancel releasing. I will be tinkering on some > minor > >> changes. > >> > > >> > Thanks; > >> > > >> > --Gurkan > >> > > >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen > herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com
