Of course.  That would be part of it, too.  Looks like I'll have to
submit this as a patch, since I'm not a committer anymore.  I keep
getting unauthorized errors when I try to commit (I tried to create a
branch).

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> we also must not forget to change our MethodHandlers, e.g. 
> NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler et al.
> Those are currently implementing the javassist.util.proxy.ProxyHandler 
> interface.
>
> It's actually not too much, but it's a pretty sensitive area.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- James Carman <[email protected]> schrieb am Di, 23.2.2010:
>
>> Von: James Carman <[email protected]>
>> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release M4
>> An: [email protected]
>> Datum: Dienstag, 23. Februar, 2010 13:40 Uhr
>> I was looking into it.  So, the
>> only place where we do any proxy
>> creation stuff is in the JavassistProxyFactory class?
>> If so, here's
>> what I plan to do:
>>
>> 1.  Rename the class.
>> 2.  Change the implementation to use Commons Proxy
>> instead, perhaps
>> the ProxyFactory used inside the logic should be looked up
>> as a
>> singleton just like we do elsewhere, so it can be
>> configured?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > I think that would be too much of a change for M4.
>> >
>> > But I definitely would like to have this for 1.0.0 :)
>> >
>> > This would completely remove us from the hardcoded
>> javassist dependency, thus integration into any kind of EE
>> Application Server would really leverage from it!
>> >
>> > Btw, thanks again for helping us on that, James!
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> > --- James Carman <[email protected]>
>> schrieb am Di, 23.2.2010:
>> >
>> >> Von: James Carman <[email protected]>
>> >> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release M4
>> >> An: [email protected]
>> >> Datum: Dienstag, 23. Februar, 2010 13:27 Uhr
>> >> Do you guys want the commons-proxy
>> >> changes in M4?
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
>> >> <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi folks;
>> >> >
>> >> > I plan to release M4 this week. Please commit
>> your
>> >> recent changes that you
>> >> > would like to include in M4 until Friday. We
>> will
>> >> freeze code on Friday
>> >> > night and I will build a release at weekend.
>> Probably
>> >> VOTE on the release
>> >> > will be at next Monday.
>> >> >
>> >> > Please do no commit __big__ changes to
>> current code
>> >> base that may cause to
>> >> > cancel releasing. I will be tinkering on some
>> minor
>> >> changes.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks;
>> >> >
>> >> > --Gurkan
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > Do You Yahoo!?
>> > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
>> herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
>> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz 
> gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Reply via email to