oki changed this now, will commit it soon

and then I'll start a snapshot deploy + site deploy.

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Tue, 9/28/10, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 2:03 PM
> Hah, yes definitely. Completely
> confusing historical artifact ;)
> 
> txs 4 the catch, could you change this please?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 1:56 PM
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Mark
> > Struberg <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi folks!
> > >
> > > We had a few very important changes in the last
> few
> > weeks
> > >
> > > *) mem leak fix
> > > *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions
> > > *) lazy SessionContext creation
> > > *) site fix (currently in progress locally)
> > > *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout
> > support
> > > *) lots of EJB improvements
> > >
> > > I'd like to run the release tasks for
> 1.0.0-alpha-3
> > tomorrow, WDYT?
> > > If you like to complete/test some feature which
> you
> > think must go into this release, then please ping me.
> > 
> > Before 1.0, should we update the name of the
> openwebbeans/
> > subdirectories and/or the maven output jars for
> > ejb/openejb?
> > 
> > webbeans-ejb produces webbeans-ejb-common.jar (which
> does
> > not depend on openejb)
> > webbeans-openejb produces webbeans-ejb.jar (which
> depends
> > on openejb)
> > 
> > Just my pet peeve/confusion, if they were just
> > ejb-common/ejb-common
> > and ejb-openejb/ejb-openejb (or openejb/openejb) it
> would
> > be less
> > confusing.
> > 
> > Of course I have no idea of the conventions in this
> area,
> > the
> > packaging ramifications, or am able to actually do the
> work
> > :)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Eric Covener
> > [email protected]
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> 



Reply via email to