SNAPSHOT + site deploy went well. The new site will show up after getting synced in a few hours.
LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 2:06 PM > oki changed this now, will commit it > soon > > and then I'll start a snapshot deploy + site deploy. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 2:03 PM > > Hah, yes definitely. Completely > > confusing historical artifact ;) > > > > txs 4 the catch, could you change this please? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing > owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 1:56 PM > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Mark > > > Struberg <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi folks! > > > > > > > > We had a few very important changes in the > last > > few > > > weeks > > > > > > > > *) mem leak fix > > > > *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions > > > > *) lazy SessionContext creation > > > > *) site fix (currently in progress locally) > > > > *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and > AroundTimeout > > > support > > > > *) lots of EJB improvements > > > > > > > > I'd like to run the release tasks for > > 1.0.0-alpha-3 > > > tomorrow, WDYT? > > > > If you like to complete/test some feature > which > > you > > > think must go into this release, then please ping > me. > > > > > > Before 1.0, should we update the name of the > > openwebbeans/ > > > subdirectories and/or the maven output jars for > > > ejb/openejb? > > > > > > webbeans-ejb produces webbeans-ejb-common.jar > (which > > does > > > not depend on openejb) > > > webbeans-openejb produces webbeans-ejb.jar > (which > > depends > > > on openejb) > > > > > > Just my pet peeve/confusion, if they were just > > > ejb-common/ejb-common > > > and ejb-openejb/ejb-openejb (or openejb/openejb) > it > > would > > > be less > > > confusing. > > > > > > Of course I have no idea of the conventions in > this > > area, > > > the > > > packaging ramifications, or am able to actually > do the > > work > > > :) > > > > > > -- > > > Eric Covener > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
