yes sure :) Maybe my words were too strong - feel free to write any objections if you think we should treat 1.0.x more liberal! The important thing to me is that we have the same understanding about the fundamental direction about what should land in the 1.0.x branch and what should went into trunk.
txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Wed, 10/20/10, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 4:10 PM > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM, > Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > small addendum: we must _only_ touch the 1.0.x branch > if this is really an important issue. That means, a blocker > or something similar. > > > > All new features + improving capabilities should > _only_ be done in 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT (aka our trunk). > > > > Whenever you hit an issue in 1.0.0 please _first_ ping > the dev list whether this should go into trunk or _also_ > should get fixed in the 1.0.x branch. > > I guess this will really be the exceptional case! > > This requirement seems a bit onerous, can we say "if > there's any question..."? >
