I agree as well. I suspect most of the time it will be clear what is a bug fix and what is a feature. If it isn't clear, then it doesn't hurt to ask.
Sincerely, Joe On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wed, October 20, 2010 7:10:51 PM > Subject: Re: Maintenance on owb_1.0_x Branch > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > small addendum: we must _only_ touch the 1.0.x branch if this is really > an > >important issue. That means, a blocker or something similar. > > > > All new features + improving capabilities should _only_ be done in > >1.1.0-SNAPSHOT (aka our trunk). > > > > Whenever you hit an issue in 1.0.0 please _first_ ping the dev list > whether > >this should go into trunk or _also_ should get fixed in the 1.0.x branch. > > I guess this will really be the exceptional case! > > EC :This requirement seems a bit onerous, can we say "if there's any > question..."? > > +1. I think no need to ping dev list. If one strongly feels that not > ensure for > committing to the branch, we can discuss it. > > --Gurkan > > > >
