@mark: +1 regards, gerhard
2013/4/11 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > I'd say we keep 1.2 as CDI-1.0 and implement CDI-1.1 in 2.0. > > Reason is that this will allow TomEE-1.6.x to switch to owb-1.2.x and take > a bit more time to implement cdi-1.1 without having to stay on owb-1.1.x > This will be much easier to maintain and develop cdi-1.1 that way imo. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Arne Limburg <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Cc: > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:12 PM > > Subject: Go ahead with CDI 1.1 > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to go ahead and implement CDI 1.1 on the OWB 1.2 stream. > > I wonder, if some of the java ee container implementors want to use the > 1.2 > > stream in a pre java ee 7 release. > > If so, I would like to find a way to do this. Maybe this would be > possible with > > a maven profile and some maven hacking (has someone used the > > maven-replacer-plugin?). > > If no one is interested in a CDI 1.0 OWB 1.2 stream, we directly can go > ahead > > and implement CDI 1.1 > > > > WDYT? > > > > Cheers, > > Arne > > >
