+1 for Mark
Please don't use 1.2 stream as CDI 1.1 implementation. In siwpas, we will use 1.2 as CDI 1.0 and compatibility. Gurkan ________________________________ Kimden: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> Kime: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Gönderildiği Tarih: 11 Nis 2013 21:23 Perşembe Konu: Re: Go ahead with CDI 1.1 I'd say we keep 1.2 as CDI-1.0 and implement CDI-1.1 in 2.0. Reason is that this will allow TomEE-1.6.x to switch to owb-1.2.x and take a bit more time to implement cdi-1.1 without having to stay on owb-1.1.x This will be much easier to maintain and develop cdi-1.1 that way imo. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Arne Limburg <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:12 PM > Subject: Go ahead with CDI 1.1 > > Hi all, > > I would like to go ahead and implement CDI 1.1 on the OWB 1.2 stream. > I wonder, if some of the java ee container implementors want to use the 1.2 > stream in a pre java ee 7 release. > If so, I would like to find a way to do this. Maybe this would be possible > with > a maven profile and some maven hacking (has someone used the > maven-replacer-plugin?). > If no one is interested in a CDI 1.0 OWB 1.2 stream, we directly can go ahead > and implement CDI 1.1 > > WDYT? > > Cheers, > Arne >
