hi romain, it depends a lot on the page (due to the check for the link-decoration).
mark had a nice idea: we can deactivate it, if there is no conversation-scoped bean in the application. -> +1 in any case we can use a separated module to get rid of the duplicated implementation (for jsf 1.x and 2.x). regards, gerhard 2013/4/12 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > Hi > > What is noticeable? > > Being handle in lazy mode it should be fine > Le 12 avr. 2013 02:02, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > hi @ all, > > > > even if an application doesn't use std. cdi conversations, they > introduce a > > noticeable overhead for >every< request. > > imo we should create an own module which is e.g. a transitive dependency > of > > the jsf module/s. > > -> that would allow to exclude it, if you don't need std. cdi > > conversations. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > >
