+1 for Mark idea Le 12 avr. 2013 21:25, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> hi romain, > > it depends a lot on the page (due to the check for the link-decoration). > > mark had a nice idea: > we can deactivate it, if there is no conversation-scoped bean in the > application. > -> +1 > in any case we can use a separated module to get rid of the duplicated > implementation (for jsf 1.x and 2.x). > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/4/12 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > Hi > > > > What is noticeable? > > > > Being handle in lazy mode it should be fine > > Le 12 avr. 2013 02:02, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > > hi @ all, > > > > > > even if an application doesn't use std. cdi conversations, they > > introduce a > > > noticeable overhead for >every< request. > > > imo we should create an own module which is e.g. a transitive > dependency > > of > > > the jsf module/s. > > > -> that would allow to exclude it, if you don't need std. cdi > > > conversations. > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > >
