yes, please go on. This was intermediate code to detect if this really happens. 
But it seems we are clean and the issue was a different one (bridge methods for 
generic superclasses)
There is an OWB issue open for it. Can you please add the info and close it as 
wont-fix?

txs and LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: 
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 April 2013, 13:18
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0
> 
>g uys,
> 
> we reomve "Proxying of a PROXY detected! Proxy class:
> XXX$$OwbInterceptProxy1 Stacktrace:..." for the release?
> 
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> *Blog: 
> **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/4/24 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>
> 
>>  +1 Gerhard, would be great.
>> 
>>  With OpenJPA and now OWB, we can think about TomEE I guess :)
>> 
>>  Jean-Louis
>> 
>> 
>>  2013/4/24 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>> 
>>  > +1
>>  >
>>  > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>  > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>  > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>  > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>  > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>  > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > 2013/4/24 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>
>>  >
>>  > > +1
>>  > > with the latest fixes it should be fine to release it.
>>  > >
>>  > > regards,
>>  > > gerhard
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > 2013/4/10 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>  > >
>>  > > > perfectly fine to ship an 1.2.0-beta-1 now and release 1.2.0 
> final
>>  > soon.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > I will start the release process on friday.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > LieGrue,
>>  > > > strub
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > > ----- Original Message -----
>>  > > > > From: Thomas Andraschko 
> <[email protected]>
>>  > > > > To: [email protected]
>>  > > > > Cc:
>>  > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 9:12 PM
>>  > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > +1 for beta
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > 2013/4/9 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> <[email protected]>
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > >>  +1 in beta mode (1.2.0.beta1?)
>>  > > > >>  Le 9 avr. 2013 21:03, "Gerhard Petracek"
>>  > > > > <[email protected]> a
>>  > > > >>  écrit :
>>  > > > >>
>>  > > > >>  > hi @ all,
>>  > > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > we have a lot of improvements for 1.2.0 -> 
> imo it would be
>>  great
>>  > to
>>  > > > >>  release
>>  > > > >>  > it within the next two weeks.
>>  > > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > regards,
>>  > > > >>  > gerhard
>>  > > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>
>>  > > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > >
>>  >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  --
>>  Jean-Louis
>> 
>

Reply via email to