removed the log th eissue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-828 not sure it should be closed now or not
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/4/24 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > yes, please go on. This was intermediate code to detect if this really > happens. But it seems we are clean and the issue was a different one > (bridge methods for generic superclasses) > There is an OWB issue open for it. Can you please add the info and close > it as wont-fix? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, 24 April 2013, 13:18 > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0 > > > >g uys, > > > > we reomve "Proxying of a PROXY detected! Proxy class: > > XXX$$OwbInterceptProxy1 Stacktrace:..." for the release? > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: > > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/4/24 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > > >> +1 Gerhard, would be great. > >> > >> With OpenJPA and now OWB, we can think about TomEE I guess :) > >> > >> Jean-Louis > >> > >> > >> 2013/4/24 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2013/4/24 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > > +1 > >> > > with the latest fixes it should be fine to release it. > >> > > > >> > > regards, > >> > > gerhard > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > 2013/4/10 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> > > > >> > > > perfectly fine to ship an 1.2.0-beta-1 now and release 1.2.0 > > final > >> > soon. > >> > > > > >> > > > I will start the release process on friday. > >> > > > > >> > > > LieGrue, > >> > > > strub > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > > > From: Thomas Andraschko > > <[email protected]> > >> > > > > To: [email protected] > >> > > > > Cc: > >> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 9:12 PM > >> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +1 for beta > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > 2013/4/9 Romain Manni-Bucau > > <[email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> +1 in beta mode (1.2.0.beta1?) > >> > > > >> Le 9 avr. 2013 21:03, "Gerhard Petracek" > >> > > > > <[email protected]> a > >> > > > >> écrit : > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > hi @ all, > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > we have a lot of improvements for 1.2.0 -> > > imo it would be > >> great > >> > to > >> > > > >> release > >> > > > >> > it within the next two weeks. > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > regards, > >> > > > >> > gerhard > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis > >> > > >
