Depends on the arguments. Both has pros and cons. If we do an api incompatible change, then classically you push the major version nr according the semantic versioning rules.
We might not often use the minor version number as we did in owb 1.0.x, 1.1.x and 1.2.x. But sometimes there is a need for this. LieGrue, strub On Monday, 27 January 2014, 8:49, Arne Limburg <[email protected]> wrote: +1 for that > > >But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that >in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion? >My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement >CDI 2.0. > > >Regards, >Arne > > >Von: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >Antworten an: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, >Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11 >An: openwebbeans-dev <[email protected]>, openwebbeans-user ><[email protected]> >Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk > > > >Hi folks! > >We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November >already. >I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward. > >I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk >to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already). >Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch. > >LieGrue, >strub > > > > > > >
