+1 romain
2014-01-27 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > +1 on the major for each spec version (like tomcat) is fine for me and > avoid confusion with technical changes for the spec targeted spec > version (1.1, 1.2 owb versions for instance) > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2014-01-27 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > Depends on the arguments. Both has pros and cons. > > If we do an api incompatible change, then classically you push the major > version nr according the semantic versioning rules. > > > > We might not often use the minor version number as we did in owb 1.0.x, > 1.1.x and 1.2.x. But sometimes there is a need for this. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 27 January 2014, 8:49, Arne Limburg < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 for that > >> > >> > >>But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed > that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion? > >>My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 > implement CDI 2.0. > >> > >> > >>Regards, > >>Arne > >> > >> > >>Von: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >>Antworten an: "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >>Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11 > >>An: openwebbeans-dev <[email protected]>, openwebbeans-user < > [email protected]> > >>Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk > >> > >> > >> > >>Hi folks! > >> > >>We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in > November already. > >>I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this > forward. > >> > >>I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our > trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November > already). > >>Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch. > >> > >>LieGrue, > >>strub > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >
