+1

A blog entry would be pretty good. I updated the boilerplate and added a
Java 8 support notice:


The Apache OpenWebBeans Team is proud to announce the release of

Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.3

Notable changes:
- Java 8 support

Apache OpenWebBeans is an Apache License v2 licensed implementation of the
JSR-299 "Context and Dependency Injection for Java EE" and JSR-330
"atinject" specifications. OpenWebBeans has a modular structure and
provides Dependency Injection scaling from Java SE environments up to EE6
server clusters with complicated ClassLoader hierarchies or OSGi
environments.

openwebbeans-1.2.3 implements the CDI-1.0 API, passes the JSR-330 TCK and
the JSR-299 standalone TCK.

Distribution packages can be downloaded from

http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/openwebbeans/1.2.3/

The release is also available in maven.central

http://repo1.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/openwebbeans/

More info can be found at

http://openwebbeans.apache.org

The Apache OpenWebBeans Team


On 21 April 2014 13:09, Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>wrote:

> +1
>
>
> 2014-04-21 13:05 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-04-21 11:18 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Awesome.
> > > +1 of course
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-04-21 11:14 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > +1 works fine on openejb for 2 weeks at least
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2014-04-21 10:34 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain has added java8 support.
> > > > > I think we should ship 1.2.3 asap.
> > > > > Could run the release tasks today if there is no -1.
> > > > >
> > > > > LieGrue,
> > > > > strub
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to