Yea, did come to the same conclusion. 
Have a dirty solution for it by just tweaking the standalone-suite.xml

LieGrue,
strub


On Tuesday, 22 April 2014, 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> 
wrote:
 
Ok
>
>extracted it in a custom suite (testng-failed generated from the
>failed run in surefire directories) and all is green.
>
>So surely a side effect of previous runs.
>
>We can surely makes run more deterministic hacking testng setup.
>Surely a side effect of changes in java 8 (on test side, not runtime)
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>2014-04-22 10:31 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have two with same issue (works on j7):
>>
>> Failed tests:
>> testConditionalObserver(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.event.observer.conditional.ConditionalObserverTest)
>>   
>>testBindingTypesAppliedToDisposalMethodParameters(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definition.DisposalMethodDefinitionTest)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-22 9:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I had a TCK error when running
>>> mvn clean install -Ptck,jsr330-tck
>>>
>>> on Win7 with Java-1.8.0_05
>>>
>>>
>>> ConditionalObserverTest#testConditionalObserver line 45
>>>
>>> It works perfectly fine on the same box if I compile it with 1.7.0_51
>>>
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>> On Monday, 21 April 2014, 13:44, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>A blog entry would be pretty good. I updated the boilerplate and added a
>>>>Java 8 support notice:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The Apache OpenWebBeans Team is proud to announce the release of
>>>>
>>>>Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.3
>>>>
>>>>Notable changes:
>>>>- Java 8 support
>>>>
>>>>Apache OpenWebBeans is an Apache License v2 licensed implementation of the
>>>>JSR-299 "Context and Dependency Injection for Java EE" and JSR-330
>>>>"atinject" specifications. OpenWebBeans has a modular structure and
>>>>provides Dependency Injection scaling from Java SE environments up to EE6
>>>>server clusters with complicated ClassLoader hierarchies or OSGi
>>>>environments.
>>>>
>>>>openwebbeans-1.2.3 implements the CDI-1.0 API, passes the JSR-330 TCK and
>>>>the JSR-299 standalone TCK.
>>>>
>>>>Distribution packages can be downloaded from
>>>>
>>>>http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/openwebbeans/1.2.3/
>>>>
>>>>The release is also available in maven.central
>>>>
>>>>http://repo1.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/openwebbeans/
>>>>
>>>>More info can be found at
>>>>
>>>>http://openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>The Apache OpenWebBeans Team
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 21 April 2014 13:09, Thomas Andraschko 
>>>><[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-04-21 13:05 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> > +1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > regards,
>>>>> > gerhard
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2014-04-21 11:18 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Awesome.
>>>>> > > +1 of course
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > 2014-04-21 11:14 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > +1 works fine on openejb for 2 weeks at least
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> > > > Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>> > > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>> > > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>> > > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > 2014-04-21 10:34 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>>>> > > > > Hi!
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > Romain has added java8 support.
>>>>> > > > > I think we should ship 1.2.3 asap.
>>>>> > > > > Could run the release tasks today if there is no -1.
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > LieGrue,
>>>>> > > > > strub
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > --
>>>>> > > Jean-Louis
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>

Reply via email to