I've created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-459 for it.
LieGrue, strub > On Sunday, 14 December 2014, 9:51, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've already discussed this and opened a CDITCK issue for a similar class. > It is entirely illegal. > You might find it in OWBs standalone-suite.xml > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > >> On Sunday, 14 December 2014, 0:30, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi >> >> do you think > org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.newBean.Wizard >> is valid? >> >> In short: >> >> @RequestScoped >> public class Wizard { >> @Inject >> @Tame >> private Dragon dragon; >> >> @Produces >> @Tame >> public Dragon summon(@New Dragon dragon) { >> return dragon; >> } >> } >> >> so wizard instance is needed to create a dragon (@Produces is not >> static) but to call summon to create a dragon we need a wizard... >> >> happen in <class >> > name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.newBean.NewEnterpriseBeanTest"/> >> but no EE link here >> >> OWB just gives a stackoverflow (which is not shocking) but I wonder if >> that's a CDI/TCK issue or it is on our side >> >> wdyt? >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >
