great, exactlt what I thought but was no more sure at all. Thanks Mark
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-14 9:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > I've created > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-459 > for it. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >> On Sunday, 14 December 2014, 9:51, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > We've already discussed this and opened a CDITCK issue for a similar class. >> It is entirely illegal. >> You might find it in OWBs standalone-suite.xml >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sunday, 14 December 2014, 0:30, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi >>> >>> do you think >> org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.newBean.Wizard >>> is valid? >>> >>> In short: >>> >>> @RequestScoped >>> public class Wizard { >>> @Inject >>> @Tame >>> private Dragon dragon; >>> >>> @Produces >>> @Tame >>> public Dragon summon(@New Dragon dragon) { >>> return dragon; >>> } >>> } >>> >>> so wizard instance is needed to create a dragon (@Produces is not >>> static) but to call summon to create a dragon we need a wizard... >>> >>> happen in <class >>> >> name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.newBean.NewEnterpriseBeanTest"/> >>> but no EE link here >>> >>> OWB just gives a stackoverflow (which is not shocking) but I wonder if >>> that's a CDI/TCK issue or it is on our side >>> >>> wdyt? >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>
