imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
-> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).

regards,
gerhard



2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:

> Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to include in
> since it starts to be used by users and libraries.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>
> > 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> > >
> > > Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >
> > > 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > >> Hi folks!
> > >>
> > >> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a new
> > >> Meecrowave release.
> > >> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair not
> much
> > is
> > >> open.
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to