fyi @MEECROWAVE-50: it works with the latest snapshot regards, gerhard
2017-07-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > hi romain, > > it should be possible to reproduce it with any demo, however, you could > use e.g. [1]. > (it uses v0.3.1, but also v0.3.2-SNAPSHOT only works on linux.) > maybe it's something simple (i haven't checked the details so far), but > there shouldn't be a different behavior across platforms... > > regards, > gerhard > > [1] https://github.com/os890/meecrowave_template_jax-rs_cdi_jpa > > > > 2017-07-04 11:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > >> @Gerhard: have the simple-demo somewhere on github? will try to resetup my >> win box in the week >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory >> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >> >> 2017-07-04 11:08 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: >> >> > imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well. >> > -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50). >> > >> > regards, >> > gerhard >> > >> > >> > >> > 2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > Yes and no (until you hit it I guess). >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194 would be nice to >> include >> > in >> > > since it starts to be used by users and libraries. >> > > >> > > >> > > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> > > rmannibucau> | >> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory >> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >> > > >> > > 2017-07-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> > > >> > > > 1.7.4 is not yet released. Do we need it? >> > > > >> > > > LieGrue, >> > > > strub >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > > [email protected] >> > > > >: >> > > > > >> > > > > Think we may want to upgrade to owb 1.7.4 before, otherwise +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> > > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> > > > rmannibucau> | >> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE >> Factory >> > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >> > > > > >> > > > > 2017-07-03 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg >> <[email protected] >> > >: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Hi folks! >> > > > >> >> > > > >> As we figured our strategy I think it would be great to ship a >> new >> > > > >> Meecrowave release. >> > > > >> I'll go through the tickets and see what is missing, but afair >> not >> > > much >> > > > is >> > > > >> open. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> LieGrue, >> > > > >> strub >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
