PS: created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1203


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-07-19 9:24 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:

> oops, was just another failing test in hammock.
>
> The one you originally mentionned - datasource one right? - looks accurate. 
> Will
> check it but just looks like we don't unwrap properly container events.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2017-07-19 9:15 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi John
>>
>> just looks like your DefaultListener misses @Dependent in annotated mode
>> to me.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>>
>> 2017-07-19 4:48 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a portable extension that registers an observer method like so:
>>>
>>> public void findSpecialBeans(@Observes ProcessBean<SpecialBean>
>>> processBean)
>>>
>>> In Weld, this gets invoked once in my test application, only for beans of
>>> type SpecialBean.  In OWB 2, this is getting invoked once for that same
>>> bean, but then again for each additional bean registered in my
>>> corresponding AfterBeanDiscovery (which none of these beans match
>>> SpecialBean). The weird part is that I don't see this behavior in OWB
>>> 1.7,
>>> and I don't see it happening within other extensions (e.g. another
>>> ExtensionB also have AfterBeanDiscovery, those beans don't invoke this
>>> extension).
>>>
>>> You can see Travis complaining about this issue at
>>> https://travis-ci.org/hammock-project/hammock/jobs/254409046
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to