Yes sorry, pointed to the wrong error. This looks much better now, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:41 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > PS: created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1203 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-07-19 9:24 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > > oops, was just another failing test in hammock. > > > > The one you originally mentionned - datasource one right? - looks > accurate. Will > > check it but just looks like we don't unwrap properly container events. > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > 2017-07-19 9:15 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi John > >> > >> just looks like your DefaultListener misses @Dependent in annotated mode > >> to me. > >> > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > >> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >> > >> 2017-07-19 4:48 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have a portable extension that registers an observer method like so: > >>> > >>> public void findSpecialBeans(@Observes ProcessBean<SpecialBean> > >>> processBean) > >>> > >>> In Weld, this gets invoked once in my test application, only for beans > of > >>> type SpecialBean. In OWB 2, this is getting invoked once for that same > >>> bean, but then again for each additional bean registered in my > >>> corresponding AfterBeanDiscovery (which none of these beans match > >>> SpecialBean). The weird part is that I don't see this behavior in OWB > >>> 1.7, > >>> and I don't see it happening within other extensions (e.g. another > >>> ExtensionB also have AfterBeanDiscovery, those beans don't invoke this > >>> extension). > >>> > >>> You can see Travis complaining about this issue at > >>> https://travis-ci.org/hammock-project/hammock/jobs/254409046 > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >> > >> > > >
