On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Nick Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: >> It looks like it the shell has its own language, Is it documented? I'm >> concerned that we're inventing a whole new language off the cuff... >> >> > the Shell is exactly like the `wsk` tool, in that there are commands. yes, > it is a langauge, of sorts, but they really are just commands. the Shell > supports all of the `wsk` commands. it augments them either to add > functions `wsk` does not have, or to offer an alternative syntax that is > (perhaps) more appealing.
Can I just say though - every demo I've seen so far has confused the heck of out me. You didn't really answer the question on documentation, and I think we *really* need something there to make it a bit more usable. (If it already exists, cool.) It looks incredibly cool, but the syntax is so... I don't know... cool (grin), that I can't even understand it. What are the plans to explain the basics? Again, not the wsk commands, I get those, but in your tool it looks alien to me! (And I don't mean that as a negative, it looks super powerful, just need help grokking it). -- =========================================================================== Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate at IBM Email : [email protected] Blog : www.raymondcamden.com Twitter: raymondcamden
