I agree with the plan Rodric Dave, What are your thinking for release notes? do you want to create the first one for one of the runtimes? I can create the other ones.
Is it just a matter of creating a branch "1.13.0-incubating" on the repo and adding a RELEASE.md file? -- Carlos On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:48 PM Rodric Rabbah <[email protected]> wrote: > Following up on this after watching today's community call replay. Dave > made the point that the big chunk of work toward this release is writing > release notes and deciding which of the components is ready. Several people > volunteered (Carlos, Matt) and I’m volunteering myself as well. > > I’d suggest we create an issue for each repo that we will include in the > release to deliver the release notes to start. > > Dave also pointed out that there’s a few staging phases to coordinate > which could take us about 3 weeks (largely because of the voting and 72hr > waiting periods). > > Dave: what else did I miss? > > -r > > > On Jan 7, 2019, at 4:55 PM, David P Grove <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I would like to see us push out a consolidated next release in the near > > future (by end of January?). I'd also like to see us attempt to > establish > > a regular cadence of such consolidated releases (perhaps quarterly?). > > > > We would start this release from the leaves of our dependency tree and > work > > up: > > 1) release all action runtimes that have changed since their last > > Apache release. > > 2) release cli tooling > > 3) release event providers > > 4) release core system (with pinned versions of runtimes, cli, and > > providers) > > 5) release packaging projects (kube-deploy, dev-tools, etc.) with > > pinned versions of entire system. > > > > I would also like to propose that although we keep semantic versioning of > > the sub-packages (openwhisk-runtime-java-x.y.z, openwhisk-cli-a.b.c, > etc), > > that we adopt a date-based version number for the consolidate > uber-release > > (eg OpenWhisk 19.01 if we actually manage to get this all out in > January). > > > > Opinions? > > > > --dave > > -- Carlos Santana <[email protected]>
