Hi James, Please follow the format of https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/blob/master/LICENSE.txt. This is the correct approach, and we have verified with the Apache community.
First, whether to add appendix. yes. Second, do we change the copyright to meet the requirement of our project? No, still keep Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]. Please raise an issue for devtool project to change the LICENSE format. Thank you. Best wishes. Vincent Hou (侯胜博) Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: [email protected], Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -----James Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: ----- To: [email protected] From: James Thomas <[email protected]> Date: 03/25/2019 12:33PM Subject: LICENSE format? Should the LICENSE.txt files in the OpenWhisk project repos include the APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work. section as-is from https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.apache.org_licenses_LICENSE-2D2.0.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=LUNmCHjmrhrkjp9ZF9fhwg&m=aQjldjIi7GndHy-lJxQCB2Q16BPW913XWPYrXxWvbfU&s=wAOyWfEFHUzS2ohx7TjosY-yiOHgUb4zQsHXQ2a6I-Y&e= OR is it supposed to be applied following the instructions in those section, e.g. Copyright 2019 Some Name... We have a variety of styles in different repos and it's not clear which we should follow. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dopenwhisk-2Dwskdeploy_blob_master_LICENSE.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=LUNmCHjmrhrkjp9ZF9fhwg&m=aQjldjIi7GndHy-lJxQCB2Q16BPW913XWPYrXxWvbfU&s=Yfz_nznzX0sWLnxwgOvxMQhppOMD1mOaTfAfm6JUo5Y&e= and https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dopenwhisk-2Ddevtools_blob_master_LICENSE.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=LUNmCHjmrhrkjp9ZF9fhwg&m=aQjldjIi7GndHy-lJxQCB2Q16BPW913XWPYrXxWvbfU&s=WTgRHKB4JcU6hwwvwwWTeZQQwtPO7MMnB9RUaUqz4v0&e= Can someone with more experience in this provide guidance on which is correct? -- Regards, James Thomas
