Hi James, I know our team took great care (Vincent specifically) in assuring all LICENSE.txt files for all repos. we release have consistency. Specifically the set listed in the README of the "release repo" here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release
See table, column 2 which links to each repo's respective LICENSE.txt file. As you can see the "devtools" repo. is not an officially released repo. and should not be considered an example... however, I do see an issue with the copyright which looks legacy and does not reflect the copyright of the now varied "experimental" projects (sub-directories) contained within. Hope this helps, Matt On 2019/03/25 16:29:32, James Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Should the LICENSE.txt files in the OpenWhisk project repos include the > > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work. > > section as-is from http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt OR is it > supposed to be applied following the instructions in those section, e.g. > > Copyright 2019 Some Name... > > We have a variety of styles in different repos and it's not clear which we > should follow. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > > and > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-devtools/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > > Can someone with more experience in this provide guidance on which is > correct? > -- > Regards, > James Thomas >
