I forgot to add that the runtime PR can actually be merged ahead of the
actual change upstream which I think we should accept.
Will wait 48hrs for comments before having a merge fest by silent assent.

-r

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:17 AM Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I went ahead and created PRs for most of the runtimes - ones missing are
> Docker, Go and Swift.
>
> I noticed for Java and Ruby we have two copies of mostly the same code for
> action-loop and non-action-loop. Do we need two copies of the same code?
> These exists in Java and Ruby. I didn't spot them elsewhere.
>
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/154
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/76
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-php/pull/71
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/27
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-java/pull/104
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-java/pull/105
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-ruby/pull/38
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-ruby/pull/39
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-rust/pull/18
>
>

Reply via email to