Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/26/2020 11:39:47 PM:
>
> There’s some apache guidance on npm naming. I can’t find it at the
> moment but will look again in the morning.
>
> @openwhisk/wskdebug is clear. We might need to include apache in the
> name though.
>

Only thing I've seen is a "draft" page on the incubator wiki with some
proposed guidance. It doesn't seem to be moving to being an official policy
with any velocity.

We own both the @openwhisk and @apache-openwhisk organizations, so we could
choose to use either as a scope for this new package.

Since there's a break from @adobe/wskdebug, I'd be inclined to put it in
either @openwhisk/wskdebug or @apache-openwhisk/wskdebug instead of just
unscoped openwhisk-wskdebug.  It seems plausible to me that in the long run
the guidance will be to use a scope with apache in the name to indicate it
is an official package managed by the PMC.

--dave

Reply via email to