+1 for either @openwhisk/wskdebug or @apache-openwhisk/wskdebug. On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/26/2020 11:39:47 PM: > > > > There’s some apache guidance on npm naming. I can’t find it at the > > moment but will look again in the morning. > > > > @openwhisk/wskdebug is clear. We might need to include apache in the > > name though. > > > > Only thing I've seen is a "draft" page on the incubator wiki with some > proposed guidance. It doesn't seem to be moving to being an official policy > with any velocity. > > We own both the @openwhisk and @apache-openwhisk organizations, so we could > choose to use either as a scope for this new package. > > Since there's a break from @adobe/wskdebug, I'd be inclined to put it in > either @openwhisk/wskdebug or @apache-openwhisk/wskdebug instead of just > unscoped openwhisk-wskdebug. It seems plausible to me that in the long run > the guidance will be to use a scope with apache in the name to indicate it > is an official package managed by the PMC. > > --dave >