+1 for either @openwhisk/wskdebug or @apache-openwhisk/wskdebug.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote on 02/26/2020 11:39:47 PM:
> >
> > There’s some apache guidance on npm naming. I can’t find it at the
> > moment but will look again in the morning.
> >
> > @openwhisk/wskdebug is clear. We might need to include apache in the
> > name though.
> >
>
> Only thing I've seen is a "draft" page on the incubator wiki with some
> proposed guidance. It doesn't seem to be moving to being an official policy
> with any velocity.
>
> We own both the @openwhisk and @apache-openwhisk organizations, so we could
> choose to use either as a scope for this new package.
>
> Since there's a break from @adobe/wskdebug, I'd be inclined to put it in
> either @openwhisk/wskdebug or @apache-openwhisk/wskdebug instead of just
> unscoped openwhisk-wskdebug.  It seems plausible to me that in the long run
> the guidance will be to use a scope with apache in the name to indicate it
> is an official package managed by the PMC.
>
> --dave
>

Reply via email to