Thanks for the update Owen. Will wait for ORC-418 before moving forward.

--Vaibhav

On 12/17/18, 3:12 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <owen.omal...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Ok, I also added ORC-418, which fixed the compilation on centos 6. I'm
    still hitting problems with compiling branch-1.5 on mac os, but I'm digging
    into it.
    
    .. Owen
    
    On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:28 PM Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    
    > One other note is that the next release candidate should be
    > release-1.5.4rc1, since you made a previous tag with the rc0 name.
    >
    > .. Owen
    >
    > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:16 PM Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Vaibhav,
    >>    It would be great to make the release.
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >>    Owen
    >>
    >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:08 PM Eugene Koifman <ekoif...@hortonworks.com>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> +1
    >>>
    >>> On 12/17/18, 10:27 AM, "Dongjoon Hyun" <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>     +1 for releasing ORC-1.5.4.
    >>>
    >>>     I've been waiting for ORC-416 and ORC-419, too.
    >>>
    >>>     Thanks,
    >>>     Dongjoon.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>     On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:12 AM Vaibhav Gumashta <
    >>> vgumas...@hortonworks.com>
    >>>     wrote:
    >>>
    >>>     > Hi all,
    >>>     >
    >>>     > I’d like to get your thoughts on making a minor ORC release off
    >>> branch-1.5
    >>>     > (current released version is ORC-1.5.3). I’m currently working on
    >>>     > HIVE-20699<https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20699>, which
    >>> needs
    >>>     > ORC-437<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-437>, which is
    >>> not part
    >>>     > of any current ORC release. In order for Hive to be able to use
    >>> ORC-437, a
    >>>     > new ORC release is needed.  If everyone is ok with it, I’m
    >>> volunteering as
    >>>     > the release manager for ORC-1.5.4.
    >>>     >
    >>>     > Please share your thoughts/suggestions.
    >>>     > Thanks,
    >>>     > --Vaibhav
    >>>     >
    >>>     >
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    

Reply via email to