Alan, Can we fix it after the release? Thanks, Owen
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 1:56 PM Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure about the license file in this release. This release includes > zlib, snappy, gmock, protobuf, and lz4 code, all of which have MIT or BSD > licenses. gmock and lz4 have LICENSE files down with the code, zlib, > snappy, and protobuf have license headers in their files but I couldn't > find any explicit LICENSE files. Aren't all of these license supposed to > be referenced in the top LICENSE file, and ideally placed together > somewhere where an interested user can easily find them? > > Other than that, all looks good. I checked the signature and hash, did a > build on centos7, looked for any wayward files in the tarball. > > Alan. > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:02 PM Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > All, > > There has been an ask for having ORC-231 backported into ORC 1.4. > > ORC-231 is an easy patch, so this should be pretty safe. There were some > > lingering patches that went on to branch-1.4 after 1.4.4 so we'll get > those > > too. > > > > Should we release the following artifacts as ORC 1.4.5? > > > > tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.4.5/ > > tag: https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.4.5rc0 > > jiras: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC/fixforversion/12345479 > > > > Thanks! > > >
