was the http:// syntax ever intended to get an actual document off the
web? [they don't work now at least]
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:02:22 -0700, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Now that all Chandler parcels are using the schema API, we have the
option of getting rid of the messy 'http:' URIs for defining parcel
namespaces. I'd like to propose that we move to a "parcel:" URI scheme,
of the form "parcel:osaf.framework.blocks" This would let us use the
same names in parcel.xml as we would use in Python code, making the
namespaces easier for humans to read, write, and remember.
Basically, we would go from this:
<core:Parcel xmlns:core="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/core";
xmlns="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/framework/blocks";
xmlns:main="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/views/main";
xmlns:detail="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/framework/blocks/detail";
xmlns:amazon="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/examples/amazon";
xmlns:doc="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/examples/amazon";>
To this:
<core:Parcel
xmlns:core="parcel:core"
xmlns="parcel:osaf.framework.blocks"
xmlns:main="parcel:osaf.views.main"
xmlns:detail="parcel:osaf.framework.blocks.detail"
xmlns:amazon="parcel:osaf.examples.amazon"
xmlns:doc="parcel:osaf.examples.amazon">
Any thoughts?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
