I should add: when I was learning parcel xml, I tried to fetch those url's
in a browser, and found it a bit confusing until I concluded they must be
there only for universal naming purposes (like java packages' reverse-dns
convention).
if unique naming across 3rd parties is the URIs' main design goal, a
system using dns would be good, esp. if the uri's were http:// links that
gave useful information
but (python paths == repository paths == namespace URI's) is awfully
convenient..
brendan
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:03:17 -0700, Brendan O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
was the http:// syntax ever intended to get an actual document off the
web? [they don't work now at least]
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:02:22 -0700, Phillip J. Eby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that all Chandler parcels are using the schema API, we have the
option of getting rid of the messy 'http:' URIs for defining parcel
namespaces. I'd like to propose that we move to a "parcel:" URI
scheme, of the form "parcel:osaf.framework.blocks" This would let us
use the same names in parcel.xml as we would use in Python code, making
the namespaces easier for humans to read, write, and remember.
Basically, we would go from this:
<core:Parcel xmlns:core="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/core"
xmlns="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/framework/blocks"
xmlns:main="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/views/main"
xmlns:detail="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/framework/blocks/detail"
xmlns:amazon="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/examples/amazon"
xmlns:doc="http://osafoundation.org/parcels/osaf/examples/amazon">
To this:
<core:Parcel
xmlns:core="parcel:core"
xmlns="parcel:osaf.framework.blocks"
xmlns:main="parcel:osaf.views.main"
xmlns:detail="parcel:osaf.framework.blocks.detail"
xmlns:amazon="parcel:osaf.examples.amazon"
xmlns:doc="parcel:osaf.examples.amazon">
Any thoughts?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev