Bryan Stearns wrote: > The change below is supposed to be an example, but much of it introduces > a new mechanism for associating detail views with items, and the example > just shows how to use that. At the meeting last week where John proposed
I agree with you. I would have expected the example to be self contained in the samples directory, and it to use the recommended methods currently available and use in Chandler without introducing new things. An example that is coded differently from the real Chandler seems less valuable than an example that shows and explains how we really do things. If John discovered a better, new way to do things, we should discuss whether or not we should take that change separately and convert ALL of our current ways into that. I think this late in 0.6 we shouldn't. -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
