Jared Rhine wrote:
"Real Chandler" examples should be separate from "hello worlds".  Full
examples (like Java's example store) should be sparse, but show the full
framework needed to hook into the various bits (such as stamping).

  
While I appreciate the notion that a hello world should be quick and to the point, I think this particular way of adding a separate mechanism for the detail view that is never used beyond hello world, is about the equivalent of saying that the following code is a good "GTK" hello world example:

main() {
    printf("Hello, world, from gtk!");
}

:)

Alec
I suppose I favor having both, with an emphasis today on the shortest
example that can be made to do useful work.  But I should be able to
"graduate" to a fully-stamped (or whatever else ViewableKind doesn't
give you) parcel via sample code tested and included in the 0.6 release.

  

I would probably include ViewableKind in 0.6 if the full example is also
done and the shorter example is the only thing that uses ViewableKind.
Risk seems low in that case, even if ViewableKind has bugs.  At least, I
would start with the ViewableKind model if it were offered and required
no patching.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
  

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to