|
Mimi: I will answer between lines Yours, Daniel Mimi Yin wrote: Sheila just sent out a request for participation in brainstorming and prioritizing calendar enhancements in 0.7. It will be our first attempt to use the wiki in conjunction with the list as a way to flesh out design issues. We'll see how it goes :o)Best of Luck! I think sometimes design list discussions will have to be more "time- based" or proceed in phases that are set by a moderator. (As we did for the Branding exercise.) For example, for calendar enhancements we are going to first open up the wiki page for people to add their own feature ideas before asking people to prioritize the list. We want to make sure that everyone has an opportunity to contribute ideas before we set about trying to prioritize them.Completely agree. The figure of a Moderator is most important to give it a coherent form. On the other hand the "time - based" is a must so as not to interfere with the work at OSAF though bulk of e mails mostly nearing a milestone (I feel responsible for this). We will also want to schedule IRC office hours where we discuss issues as a group anything from Brainstorming use cases and ideas to heuristic evaluations and workflow walkthroughs.I have been passively attending IRC to see how it works. I have a question on this, are people all the time reading or is it something that you get in and out periodically. On the other hand I might be like listening, but I am actually working on another program and/or task. In this way, the design discussions will probably feel more moderated and coordinated than some of the Devlist discussions.+1 Mimi :o) |
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
