On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Grant Baillie wrote:

(Trimming CC:s)

I concur vociferously with PJE & Katie.

+1 to calling the trunk 0.7M, 0.7dev, 0.7alpha, or 0.7a. (In order of preference; while "alpha" has a cool retro 50's sci-fi ring to it, for the most part I tend to associate it with "buggy and slow").

+1 to using 0.7dev or 0.7M.




FWIW, that's how the projects I've worked on in the past have labelled releases. E.g. "trunk" OS builds at Apple call themselves 10.5 (+ an internal build identifier), and 10.4.x software updates and security patches are done off a branch from 10.4. (Cynics might observe that the thing Apple will call "10.5" would more accurately be labelled something like "10.5dev.250" or "10.5b1" :).

--Grant

On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:58 , Phillip J. Eby wrote:

It sounds to me from this discussion that it's not a question of forward *or* backward, but forward *and* backward numbering. If we release a new version of an old branch, that's a postrelease tag on the old version number. If we release an in-development milestone of a future version, that's a prerelease tag. Whether these are done from the trunk or a branch makes relatively little difference, as does whether we use 0.7dev.m1 or 0.7a1 to designate a prerelease milestone of 0.7.

I personally find the scheme we've been using to be odd, because it doesn't reflect our *goals*. In my view, we've been working on early (i.e. pre-release) versions of 0.6, and now we'll be working on pre-releases of 0.7 until we're ready to release 0.7. I don't actually know what is meant in this discussion by "forward" or "backward" versioning, because those terms don't make sense to me either. The numbers don't go forward or backward, we are simply issuing either pre-releases or post-releases. What we *have* been doing is giving post-release version numbers for our pre-release versions. We should simply be clear about the difference between the two.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to