On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 11:50 AM 12/7/2005 -0800, Andi Vajda wrote:
If the tinderboxes are smart enough to know who the last committers were
and are smart enough to know that the build or tests are failing they are
obviously smart enough to send mail or otherwise ping on irc the allegedly
guilty parties. If they do it in mail, the tinderboxes should also send the
complete stack trace of the failure, something that can be a pain to
extract via the browser interface.
Focusing on implementation issues here, the current way that hardhat runs
tests would probably make it difficult for an automated process to extract
just the failure. I think we could ultimately fix that too, but it's a more
invasive change than just sending an email with some highlights from the log
and a link or two. We could create a completely external tool to do failure
notifications that way, whereas smart error extraction would probably require
some changes to hardhat.
Not that I think it shouldn't be done in the long-term, it's just that it's
not the lowest-hanging fruit here. Just having *some* kind of failure
notification pushed to the committers would be a big step forward here over
the current need to poll the status page. (And not just because it would
eliminate rotating sheriff duty, but because it'd be more convenient for
developers, too.)
+1
Andi..
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
