On Dec 7, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
and so on - why not just add "check tinderbox in X minutes" to make sure your change hasn't broken the different OS related builds?I'm much more likely to check my email than the tinderboxes. I also have an IRC window open most of the time. But I don't have a browser window openmost of the time (small laptop screen).
currently the build status is mentioned, via the bot soup, in IRC and there are a number of different sized status windows that the tinderbox offers including non-browser ones.
I'm having trouble seeing why checking email or IRC for a status update is any worse/better/different than checking email - the *only* thing I can see so far is that email is targeted and that will be the case only for a single commit change. It wouldn't be the case if, during a busy day, 5 or 6 people have updated the source.
--- Bear Build and Release Engineer Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osafoundation.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://code-bear.com PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
